Advisory
We engineer a record that corporate teams and investors can read. The aim is to show what the rocks support, what they do not, and what it would cost to find out.
A single unchecked assumption in a resource or a drill plan is expensive. These are the reviews we are asked to do before that happens.
We read the vendor model against the underlying data: collars, assays, wireframes, classification, and the economic assumptions tied to them. The deliverable is a list of findings ranked by what they do to value, not a restatement of the seller's report.
Resource and reserve inputs are checked against JORC or NI 43-101 expectations. We look for missing QAQC, unsupported classification, and metal that exists in the table but not in the samples.
Interim results are interpreted while the rigs are still turning. Holes that will not change the model are stopped. Holes that will close a material gap are moved up the queue.
The acquisition review caught a classification problem in the copper belt dataset before the bid was final. We walked away from that asset.
Raushon J.
They translated the geological metrics into a note the board could use. Drill metres dropped after the first review because low-information holes were cut.
Arshell Bosie
Lead Exploration Director
Rigorous, and willing to say when the data does not support the story in the teaser. That is what we hired them for.
Narcissus N.
